Android security and privacy guide

Updated: February 27, 2024

Can and should one be concerned with how their personal data is used and managed online? Yes. The answer is yes. But there are two aspects to it. One, the obvious implications of your data being misused. Two, the simple question of basic human dignity. If you let smartphones treat you like an idiot, you become, ipso facto, an idiot. This is why you should consider tweaking your devices, so they're less noisy, less data-greedy, less everything. Welcome to my newest guide on how to make Android behave.

This ain't my first rodeo with Android privacy. A few years back, I wrote a namesake article, detailing a reasonable, no-nonsense approach to using an Android phone, with some level of privacy and without greatly sacrificing usability. A pragmatic middle-ground formula, if you will. Today, I'd like to expand on that old guide, make it a bit more structured, and up to date. Begin, we shall.

Table of Contents

  1. What is this guide about?
  2. Paranoid versus pragmatic
  3. Step 1: Purchasing an Android device
  4. Step 2: Installation
  5. Step 3: Sensors
  6. Step 4: Biometrics
  7. Step 5: Going through Settings, everything
  8. Step 6: Applications
    1. Permissions
      1. Yeah or nay?
      2. Background data access & unrestricted data
      3. Other general permissions (photos, contacts, etc)
      4. Special app access
    2. Required applications
    3. Recommended applications
    4. How to configure newly installed apps
      1. Use with or without an email/user account
    5. System applications
  9. Step 7: Analytics & diagnostics
  10. Step 8: Personalization, Google account
  11. Step 9: Messaging apps
  12. Step 10: Anti-malware software
  13. Step 11: VPNs
  14. Step 12: Data backups
  15. Conclusion

What is this guide about?

I shall use a clever literary device to illustrate my point. Negation. Instead of telling you what this guide is, I will start by first telling you what it is NOT. To wit:

OK, with that in mind, please also note:

Paranoid versus pragmatic

Another important aspect of this guide is that I want to make it simple and accessible for everyday users, with everyday needs. If you're Jason Bourne reincarnate, this isn't for you. If you're a Bond villain, same thing. I want this guide to allow the optimal combination of privacy, security and actual functionality.

The idea is for you to still actually be able to use your device and do things, like browsing, music, streaming, perhaps even banking and such, if that's what you want or need. If you don't want to use your phones for any of these purposes, you don't trust Google or such, you don't want to use the Play Store, then don't. There are tons of different ways to do that. The basic premise is that you actually want to use Android. That's out starting point.

Step 1: Purchasing an Android device

Ideally, you want to buy a phone that will be supported for a long time. The situation has improved lately, with more and more vendors pledging longer update cycles. In the past, you'd be lucky if you got a single major version upgrade, and perhaps 2-3 years of patching. Nowadays, you can find phones with five, even seven years of support. I think this is a useful part of the security equation. From what I know, Samsung, Google and Fairphone offer devices with 5-7 years of upgrades and patches. You can probably find a device you want from among these three. There might be other vendors with similar policies. Worth reading a bit before splurging cash.

Step 2: Installation

For the most part, there's not much you need to think about when setting up a new device. One, be thorough and methodical. Two, untoggle anything and everything you don't like or need. Three, do not rush to get online, you should spend several slow, careful hours taming your device.

Step 3: Sensors

Most phones are quite "noisy". They are configured for instant connectivity. However, for the most part, this is not the best security or privacy posture. The sensors you use emit a lot of information about your device, which can potentially be captured and analyzed. in particular, there's no reason to ping every Wi-Fi router or Bluetooth-capable device in your vicinity unless you intend to actively use them.

My recommendations are as follows:


When it comes to location services, they can be useful, especially if you intend to navigate. But most of the time, you really do not need the location services turned on. Toggle on when necessary. Furthermore, I would suggest enabling Location for relevant apps only when in use.

Android also uses a number of other location services, including earthquake alerts, emergency service, location accuracy, history and sharing, plus improved accuracy via Wi-Fi and Bluetooth scanning. When it comes to "safety", which would be earthquake and emergency, I really cannot tell you what to do. Use your own judgment. Personally, I think if you do not live in a seismically active region, you don't need the former. The latter can be useful, but even then, it depends on your risk appetite and the actual environmental and societal conditions. The important thing here is, be aware these settings exist and turn them on/off as needed.

I see no reason to use any accuracy service, location history or sharing. I don't see value in these functions. One, I don't need a reminder as to where I've been, I know where I've been. Two, I don't see any reason why I ought to share a digital trace of my whereabouts. To what end.

Last but not the least, please note that turning location off does NOT mean you become invisible to either Google, your cellular provider, and/or other entities. You simply reduce a vector of deliberate data exposure of your location, within what's plausible with a smartphone.

Location Location, details

Location services

Step 4: Biometrics

A lot of modern devices come with various readers - fingerprint readers, iris and retina scanners, microphones for voice recognition, and then some. These can be used to potentially identify you, and simplify your login process into your own device. Alas, this is a misplaced approach.

Newsflash: Biometrics should NOT be used as a replacement for passwords!

This is the biggest load of nonsense that has come to the tech world in the past decade. Too much Hollywood, it seems. First, this isn't original in any way. Second, all the "evidence" we have shows that biometrics are cool but not really safe. After all, we've all seen those movies where spies and hax0rs and whatnot fake user's retina, fingerprint or voice, and gain access to this or that facility. Nothing new, either. This was the premise of James Bond's Thunderball, back in the 1960s (and written way before that). The idea is there, and it looks techy and fun.

The simple problem is - in all of these examples, biometrics were a method of authentication, not identification. Indeed, biometrics being "unique" - they should be used to identify people, followed a SECOND challenge, which would be some form of authentication (like a password).

And yet, just like in the movies, many companies insist on biometrics being used for authentication. You show your face or fingerprint, and you're allowed to unlock and use your hardware. This is nonsense, no matter how sophisticated the actual method of identification+authentication is, because your biometrics are: 1) public 2) irreplaceable.

Think about it. If someone "steals" your biometrics, you can't do anything. Your voices or eyes or fingerprints cannot be changed like a password. I've even come across banks that insist on using voice identification for their customers - but what they actually do is forget the second part - the authentication. They assume that if they hear a voice (usually saying a certain phrase), then the actual person is you. But that's total nonsense. Especially today, when you can use ML/AI to synthesize voice and speech from a relatively tiny sample of short audio recordings.

Biometrics could be a good first part of a 2FA or MFA mechanism - instead of say a username or a phone number or whatever. But they cannot or should not be the second part of this mechanism, and definitely not ALL parts thereof. In essence, any system that uses biometrics like that is a one-factor system, and it uses publicly accessible information for that (your face, your voice, your whatever, which can be relatively easily obtained in the modern digital world). That's anti-security, if you ask me. Hint: one of the reasons many companies eschew 2FA for 1FA is because idiots, I mean users, often forget their credentials. It's more convenient (and cheaper) to put people at some calculated risk over potential data loss and unauthorized access than having support teams deal with password resets all day long.

Therefore, my suggestion would be: do not use biometrics unless it's for pure convenience, and you don't really do anything important on your phone. But even then, it's just bad practice.


As Dr. Evil would say: How about nooooo.

Step 5: Going through Settings, everything

The next step in your privacy and security hardening is to go through everything in your phone's settings. This can be a long and laborious process. It's also a convoluted process, as the different options are scattered all over the place. Furthermore, many vendors add their own customization, which complicates the work, as no two Android phones are quite the same. Lastly, in some cases, you will need to open certain apps or widgets and make additional privacy- and security-focused changes there.

Therefore, you should focus on all of the following:

Step 6: Applications

The bulk of phone security and privacy comes down to the software you're gonna be using. This is your primary vector of exposure to things good and bad, and will ultimately determine what kind of trail you leave behind you. Here, the process for security and privacy hardening is a bit convoluted.

The problem is, there's no "linear" way to handle this list, so I will be jumping back and forth a little.


Most smartphones are configured with overly permissive application settings. The reasons for this are many, and not necessarily just blatant user profiling and greed. Yes, those are (a big) part of the equation, of course, but the primary reason for everything being DEFAULT ON is because most people are clueless (idiots). They would not be able to change anything if their life depended on it. And as it happens, stupid people are conveniently good for business. But let's not get too cynical.

Ideally, phones should have two basic modes - common user, like now, and expert user, where everything is set to off, and you need to manually turn things on if and when needed. The only question is, would that break the user experience?

Yeah or nay?

Now, over the years, I discovered that the restrictive mode actually works really well. In almost 100% of the cases, if an app needs a permission, it will prompt and ask for it. So it can be done. The only major difference is that it introduces a level of disruption into the usage model. My experience isn't restricted to any one particular phone, or a short period of time. Nope. We're talking roughly five years of use, six-ish devices from several manufacturers, Android versions 9-14.

The ONLY time I broke something was the Gallery application on the Samsung A54 phone, just recently, and it comes down to this application not being able to delete images. However, it still isn't really a big problem, as I'm using Google Photos rather than Samsung Gallery as my photo application. In other words, the issue is relatively small, and easily worked around, and it's the only instance of any sort of breakage I've experienced with my everything-OFF model. P.S. And, it's also been fixed since - the vendor released a patch that seems to have fixed whatever was borked, without me reducing my privacy or security stance one bit. We will talk about this in more detail in one of the Samsung A54 follow-up reports.

Permissions can be managed in multiple ways:

Permission manager

Now, let's carefully review all the different permissions and data vectors.

Background data access & unrestricted data

Should apps be allowed to communicate when "closed"? For the most part, no. Why? After all, if you stopped using an app, there's no real reason why it should continue sending and receiving information in the background.

Therefore, my approach is as follows:

This can be a tedious process, depending on how your phone buckets and presents applications. In the worst case, you will need to go into the Apps section, open the settings for every single listed app, and then look for a sub-section that says: Mobile data, background data or data usage. Open it, then toggle off background data usage for the apps that don't need it (based on the classification above).

Background data off

Another data setting is Unrestricted data. This defines whether the specific app can use any amount of data it wants. There are two reasons why you may want to disable this for all except: Play services and your carrier or service provider. Reason one, apps shouldn't be able to communicate without control. Two, you may accidentally exceed your data allowance.

Unrestricted data

Other general permissions (photos, contacts, etc)

Next, most applications have access to way too many resources, again, for the same reasons mentioned earlier. At some point in the future, an app may need something like Photos or Contacts or Camera, and so, quite often, the permissions are set to ON by default. In most cases, this is unnecessary, and may pose a privacy or security risk if the app misbehaves, for whatever reason.

Therefore, my approach is as follows:

In general, most apps don't need as much as they ask for. For example, I use my Firefox browser with no permissions. If and when I might require something, I can turn the permissions on briefly, do what I need, and then turn them off. The cross-app functionality is a nice thing, but often not necessary. Why would Photos need access to your Calendar? Or why would WhatsApp need access to your Call logs? Both these programs work great without these specific permissions.

App example App example details

App asks for permission

When needed, the apps will ask.

Special app access

To make things somewhat confusing, Android separates common permissions like Phone, Calendar, Contacts, and alike from Special app access, like Display over other apps, Picture-in-Picture, Premium SMS, Wi-Fi control, Unrestricted data, Install unknown apps, and then some. In a way, these are equally if not more important than the common permissions.

Access special permissions, etc Special permissions

This is the list that I have recently seen on Samsung A54, Android 14, and my stance: For the most part, few if any applications should ever need special permissions. Like before, my approach is to deny all, check if anything breaks, and then selectively restore if and when needed.

Please note that some phones will show all apps in the list, including both user and system apps. Some phones will have a separate toggle to show/hide system apps. We will discuss system apps separately. Just be aware that you can also set rules and special permissions for system apps, with all the implications and ramifications that such an action carries. In others, you could - accidentally or deliberately - block or break a system app.

All system access Appear on top

Change system settings Picture-in-Picture

Premium SMS Restrict bg data

Install unknown apps Wi-Fi control

Some phones may also have special controls for microphone and clipboard. At some point, I guess these will become individual toggles for each and every app. If your device has them, you need to think carefully what you want to do. I don't think disabling the microphone is useful, unless you never use the phone as a phone. Clipboard access is definitely something you should monitor, if possible.

Additional controls

Required applications

So far, we talked about what to do with various applications and their permissions. The bigger question is, what applications do you actually want or need? Because if you don't need an app, you don't it installed, and then, you don't need to worry about its permissions.

It can be difficult to decide what you need. But here's a general rule - if a certain "activity" does not require persistence, or there's no need for customization, you don't need an app. Let's take weather as an example. Most phones offer built-in weather widgets, so you rarely think about it, but say there was no weather app installed on your device. You can open a browser, open a new tab, and just go to your favorite weather service, and check the forecast for wherever you need to, be it your location or some other place in the world.

Similarly, say Youtube. You don't need an app, open a browser tab. Radio streaming? Again, most stations and services have a website, and you can listen to the broadcast there. It can be convenient to install an app, but that also gives that app access to your system.

In fact, using a browser is a much better option for many reasons:

Remember, most "apps" are simply single-page websites, wrapped in a nice UI. But they are essentially Web pages, with some HTML code, Javascript, and a database. None of this needs to reside on your host. Here and there, sure, but in general, nope.

Therefore, the basic rules are as follows:

Disabled Deep sleep

App list

Recommended applications

Now that we've sanitized the list, let's talk about good, essential applications. The most important part of your application arsenal will be your browser - it's the portal by which you will use the Internet. Now, I am aware that there are people for whom social media is their life, and they will "exist" in this or that app. They are not the intended audience for this article, and I'm pretty confident they won't ever see it, read it, or want to read it.

The browser, yes. For me, there's only one choice. Firefox.

Here's why you should use Firefox (including the Android version):

My first order of the business on any Android device is to install Firefox, UBO, Noscript, and then relax. Without these, the Internet is unusable. Now, over the years, I did encounter a few sites that would not load correctly in Firefox, due to the horrible coding practices by their developers. Those sites are permanently blacklisted from my usage, and the rest works great. Another major bonus is improved battery life. By blocking ads, conserving bandwidth and CPU (needed to process ads), the use of Firefox + UBO (even if you don't want Noscript) will help you gain more time in between charges. How much exactly, hard to say. But my general tweaking formula outlined here (which also includes disabling pretty much everything + Firefox as the default browser) usually leads to at least 20% improvement, often way way more.

Firefox + UBO

I also like VLC as my media player. Fast, elegant, with no ads or tracking. VLC can play pretty much any audio or video format, it supports subtitles, and you can even use it as a media server. I did that when I tested iPhone 13 recently, in fact, which allowed me to copy music onto the device without using iTunes. But that's a separate if fantastic topic.


As for the rest, it's very hard to say what you should use. However, here are some general recommendations that should help you decide what apps you may want to actually install and run:

How to configure newly installed apps

Here's my recommendation on what you should do when you install a new app.

Use with or without an email/user account

It is quite common to be auto-signed into apps on Android, or to have the system ask you to sign in. This allows personalization and such, but it also potentially helps create a more accurate profile of your usage. While it is hard to know exactly how "the system tracks you", you can still be diligent and follow a simple process that ought to help minimize your data exposure.

My suggestion would be, if you MUST use an account, then:

System applications

Warning: Changing permissions and settings for system apps CAN screw things up.

If you are skilled enough, and you understand the potential consequences, you can also make changes to Android system apps. You can even uninstall some, if you want. Just remember that you may lose functionality if you do so.

As I mentioned earlier, some phones show you everything, others have a toggle that lets you display system apps. Tweaking these is no different than what a PC user would do for their Windows services. You can turn things off, but you may also break something if you're not 100% sure what you're doing.

Show system


Bluetooth, change system settings

Step 7: Analytics & diagnostics

Some phones may collect additional data - usage data, analytics. In some cases, this data can be beneficial, as it may help improve the product. However, my experience shows that despite enormous data collection over the years, the software products, by and large, aren't better than they used to be. I don't see a direct correlation between data collection and quality. In fact, it's the opposite. From a privacy perspective, you should turn telemetry off, where possible.

Diagnostics Usage data

There isn't a single place where you can configure this, so you will need to go through every settings on your phone. You will need to check any mention of usage, diagnostics, analytics, user improvement, or similar. Furthermore, you should look at data sharing and any "connections" among apps.

Step 8: Personalization, Google account

One of the more appealing aspects of the Android ecosystem is that you use your Google account for your phone, and because it's connected to almost every activity and app on that device, you have a more personalized, more "precise" experience. This may be, but my personal take is that this isn't worth it. One, the actual results are not as good as they should be (because most services struggle with outliers, and nerdy techy types are a big outlier when it comes to mainstream consumerism). Two, from a privacy perspective, I don't see an obvious reason why I ought to share my activities with the device vendor or alike.

My recommendation would be to turn off most of the personalization features:

Account settings 1 Account settings 2

Ad privacy Shared data

Autofill Nearby devices

I would also suggest, in every single app you intend to use, to turn off various personalization features. For example, suggestions and smart replies in Messages, or third-party keyboard addons. Some of these could be genuinely useful, but they also tell a story. Use what you think makes sense.

Suggestions Keyboard

Some basic memeing is acceptable. We're all human, after all. Maybe.

Step 9: Messaging apps

A big part of device usage is messaging - people chat with friends and strangers using the likes of Messages, Viber, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, and other tools of this nature. All good, except these tools also bring in security and privacy implications.

If you've followed the tech news in the past two or three years, you must have come across articles talking about zero-day, zero-click exploits in messaging software. The main reason why the exploits worked was because the software didn't correctly parse media - usually images, to be more precise.

The problem is quite simple - messaging apps can display images and videos. To do that, they use various audio and video libraries. If there is a critical vulnerability in one of these, then potentially, it is possible to hack the system. Now, again, if you read these articles, you will note that this is some real James Bond stuff. In other words, not the focus of this guide. Finding exploits in media libraries is not everyday business.

The outcome of these incidents, James Bond aside, is that phone vendors had to rush out patches to their software, to mitigate the vulnerabilities. Once the problems became public, it wasn't a question of select individuals being targeted, it became a problem of billions of devices being potentially at risk. This ties into the patching regime for this or that Android manufacturer. Your phone may be out of the support cycle, and you may not receive important, perhaps even critical updates.

The second outcome of these incidents is that various phone vendors began implementing extra security, especially for people who may find themselves at extreme risk of being hacked. For example, Apple implemented the Lockdown Mode, which I checked and tested. For me, being a peasant, Lockdown Mode proved to be way more interesting as a tool that makes the phone usage quieter and cleaner rather than a security feature. Still.

With Android, there isn't a single Lockdown Mode functionality available. Every vendor implements their own security policy. As a specific example, I read that Samsung uses Message Guard, which processes and sanitizes images in a sandbox before showing them to the user. This ought to mitigate any such exploits. However, it seems to be only active by default for Samsung and Google Messages, and if you want to extend the functionality to other apps, you need to use Auto Blocker. I intend to review this in my third A54 report. But from what I see, it might not be worth activating, as it requires agreeing to a third-party EULA, plus the use of an anti-malware app, which is not something that I consider useful. Essential apps and all that. But that's a topic for the near future.

I am not 100% sure what tools other phone manufacturers use, if any. Where does this leave you? It would seem that there isn't a comprehensive solution to how you handle media in messaging apps, or the potential implications. Therefore, the next best option you can do is to try to minimize your exposure - not from being hax0red by Bond-level players, but from accidental encounters with potentially malicious content.


Similarly, where possible, disable Web URL previews. On one hand, a preview may help you decide whether you should "click" and follow the link, but on the other, for that same reason, if you actually need to decide, then, when there's doubt, there's no doubt. The simple answer is don't. Ideally, you will only click on links from trusted contacts - although that's no guarantee these are what you want. Your contacts may be "hacked", or they may send you pointless, malicious or undesired content by mistake.

Step 10: Anti-malware software

Should you use any security software on your phone? My answer is: no. I don't see any reason to use anti-whatever on any devices, be it a Windows machine or an Android phone. By and large, if you don't install random software, you're not at any great risk (unless personally targeted, in which case you have a much, much bigger problem). On the phone, your "biggest" problem is a super-rare zero-day, zero-click vulnerability in one of the media libraries (usually images, as most software is designed to handle images automatically, as opposed to other file types). But that's about it. We've already discussed Bluetooth and adblocking, the other two major vectors of potential exposure.

Google Play comes with Play Protect, which will scan your device for (known) harmful apps and remove them if found. It will also remove permissions from apps you haven't used in a while. Those two methods are already robust enough when it comes to everyday usage.

Step 11: VPNs

Much like the biometrics, a lot of people mistake VPNs for what they are. The purpose of these apps is not to make you invisible. Their purpose is to allow you to establish a trusted network connection on an untrusted network medium. Say you're traveling, and you're now at some little hotel. You may not want to open your mail or whatnot when connected directly to their Wi-Fi. But then, you could launch your VPN, and then use that. Furthermore, in some scenarios, VPNs can allow you to work around geoblocks, and in some cases, they may be mandatory for certain activities (your workplace may require them for remote connections).

VPNs don't "hide" what you do. They shift the activity to the VPN provider. If you run a VPN tunnel, then perhaps your hotel or your ISP cannot see what you're doing (depends on how the VPN handles DNS leaks), and all they see is that you established an encrypted connection to a server somewhere, but your VPN company is the second endpoint of the secure tunnel, and they can definitely see what you're doing. Whether they log and keep that info is another manner, but you're definitely not invisible. Monty Python's How not to Be Seen.

Thus, the question is, should you use a VPN on your Android?

The simple answer is: maybe.

Step 12: Data backups

Should you allow your phone to back up to the cloud? The answer isn't a straightforward yes or no. First, let's begin by discerning among different types of data backups that may be used on your phone:

Each of these warrants a completely different approach:


And we've reached the end of this fairly long and exhausting (perhaps exhaustive) tutorial. As I said in the beginning, its purpose is not to make you "immune" to hax0rs. If you think you may be a target of some international criminal mastermind or alike, this guide isn't for you. My article focuses on simple, everyday usage, and convenient, practical security and privacy tips that should help you somewhat reduce your exposure to nonsense, spam, data leaks, and potential problems. The idea here is to make your phone use less battery, show fewer pointless ads, and reduce noise. You can somewhat improve your privacy and security stance, but you also need to be aware that perfection in any of these areas is not possible on this modern Internet.

If you're using a smartphone, that already is a choice, a compromise. It's not all bad, either. But the usage of modern technology comes with a price. You also gain convenience, perhaps even fun. That said, it does not mean you should succumb to stupidity, and just let things be. The Android operating system and its flavors come with a HUGE set of privacy options and tweaks. They aren't active by default, but they DO exist. Use them. The same goes for security. You can toggle things on and off, without any great tricks. Hopefully, this guide outlines the various steps you can try and implement, to make your online usage a bit nicer and more elegant, perhaps with an added dose of privacy and dignity. That would be all. See ya.